Lost Password? Register
  • Narrow screen resolution
  • Wide screen resolution
  • Auto width resolution
  • Increase font size
  • Decrease font size
  • Default font size
  • default color
  • red color
  • green color

Biddho.com Eritrea - Rising To The Challenges!    

Tuesday
Oct 07th
Home arrow News arrow The Axis of Intervention
The Axis of Intervention Print E-mail
Written by Administrator   
Sunday, 23 September 2007
John Feffer, IRC | July 27, 2006

There is a new force in foreign policy: the “axis of intervention.” Two allies are official members: the United States and Israel. With its recent invasion of Somalia, Ethiopia has joined the grouping. A fourth nation, Japan, is petitioning for membership. The Bush administration has not attacked any countries recently. But in President George W. Bush's first five years in office, the United States has established a dangerous precedent in international affairs. The attack on Afghanistan launched a war against not only a state (the Taliban-led government) but also a paramilitary organization (al-Qaida). The intervention into Iraq was the first example of a “preventive” war—a campaign not just to preempt an imminent attack but also to prevent any potential conflict in the future. And finally, the United States has introduced the concept of a “war without end.” The United States is fighting an unknown number of terrorists. If one organization surrenders or is destroyed, another will inevitably take its place.

Israel has matched these U.S. policies. The current interventions in Lebanon and Gaza target paramilitary organizations (Hezbollah, Hamas) and sovereign entities (the Lebanese government, the Palestinian National Authority). The attacks were a direct response to the kidnapping of two Israeli soldiers, but formed part of a broader effort to prevent any future offensives from their hostile neighbors. Both conflicts are but the latest in a half-century war. And just as the U.S. invasion of Iraq has produced more terrorists than it has suppressed, Israel's bombing of its enemies only generates more ill will toward the country. If Israel doesn't begin to take negotiations seriously, its very own war without end will spiral further out of control.

Ethiopia sent its troops into Somalia on July 20 to prop up a weak government. Ethiopia is desperate to prevent the growing power of the Islamic Courts, a militant Islamic movement that has its own militias. But the intervention is also part of the longstanding conflict with Eritrea, which Ethiopia accuses of supporting the Islamic Courts. The intervention, however, only further radicalizes the Islamic Courts and boosts Somali public opinion in their favor.

Japan signaled its interest in joining this axis of intervention by putting the military option onto the table in its dealings with North Korea. After Pyongyang's launch of seven missiles on July 4, leading Japanese government spokesman Shinzo Abe said, “If we accept that there is no other option to prevent a missile attack, there is an argument that attacking the missile bases would be within the legal right of self-defense.”

Unlike the United States, Israel, or Ethiopia, Japan was until recently the furthest thing from an aggressive power. It enjoyed five decades of a “peace constitution.” Its military was restricted to defense. It had very little capacity to attack another country.

Now Japan wants to have a “normal” military. In today's world, “normal” unfortunately translates into a capacity to launch ill-advised military interventions. Japan is acquiring an in-air refueling capacity that will allow long-range bombing missions. It is changing its constitution to permit a wide range of military operations. Some Japanese officials have even broken the taboo and discussed Japan's potential need for nuclear weapons. And Japan has been one of the closest supporters of recent U.S. military campaigns, including the endless war on terrorism.

It's bad enough that the world's most prominent proponent of state pacifism has renounced its tradition. What will happen to global security when the world's second richest country joins the arms race and begins to contemplate long-range bombing campaigns? China and South Korea have raised the alarm about Japan's new militarism. But the Bush administration has a very short historical memory.

The new axis of intervention targets not only sovereign states like North Korea and non-state actors like Hezbollah and the Islamic Courts. With the news of Israeli attacks against Red Cross vehicles and a clearly marked UN observation post in Lebanon, the real target of the axis of intervention becomes clear: the institutions of international law. By resorting to military force and scorning diplomacy, both Israel and the United States have undermined the United Nations and key global agreements such as the Geneva Conventions. It remains to be seen whether Japan and Ethiopia will sign on to this larger agenda.

The possibilities of global cooperation opened up by the end of the Cold War have come to a dead-end. The axis of intervention promises a future that resembles the distant past, what the English theorist Thomas Hobbes called the “war of all against all.” It is a world, ironically, where both aggressive countries like the United States and Israel and aggressive non-state actors like al-Qaida and the Islamic Courts will feel right at home.

While the events of recent weeks have been indeed disturbing, the world hasn't slid entirely down the slippery slope. Interventions have taken place, but internationalism is not dead. As the stunning front page of The Independent graphically represented, the world community has united in favor of an immediate ceasefire in Lebanon—the only dissent comes from the United States, Britain, and Israel. Japan's threat to launch a preemptive attack on North Korea has generated nothing but criticism in the region and has not found much favor with the Bush administration either. Indeed, all the key countries continue to scramble to find a multilateral solution to North Korea's nuclear problem. And if the current transitional government in Somalia can persuade Ethiopia to leave—with some pressure exerted from the outside by a superpower or two—Islamic militias will be much more disposed to participate in UN-brokered talks.

The United States government, with John Bolton still in place as its envoy to the United Nations, is no fan of multilateralism. The Bush administration remains strongly on the side of intervention. But with an international reputation that sags ever more precipitously and a military capability stretched well beyond sustainability, the United States might have no other choice than to accept multilateral solutions on an ad hoc basis.

Such ad hoc multilateralism is not ideal. But it's better than an ever growing axis of intervention.

John Feffer is the co-director of Foreign Policy In Focus (online at www.fpif.org) for the International Relations Center (www.irc-online.org).
Comments
Add NewSearchRSS
Only registered users can write comments!




Reddit!Del.icio.us!Google!Live!Facebook!Slashdot!Netscape!Technorati!StumbleUpon!Simpy!Newsvine!Furl!Blogmarks!Yahoo!Ma.gnolia!FeedMeLinks!
Last Updated ( Sunday, 23 September 2007 )
 
< Prev   Next >


>> Download MP3 Song - "Egermenalo" by Wedi Tikabo

 

For The Record

Ethiopia rejects the Eritrean imaginary claim of sovereign territory occupied by Ethiopia

United States causes or lengthens crises worldwide

STATEMENT BY HIS EXCELLENCY MR. OSMAN SALEH
MINISTER OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS OF THE STATE OF ERITREA
AT THE GENERAL DEBATE OF THE 63rd SESSION OF THE UNITED NATIONS GENERAL ASSEMBLY NEW YORK, 29 SEPTEMBER 2008 Osman Mohammed Saleh, Minister for Foreign Affairs of Eritrea: Report of Speech at the UN General Assembly
Osman Mohammed Saleh, Minister for Foreign Affairs of Eritrea: Report of Speech at the UN General Assembly

German Finance Minister says US will no longer be the financial Superpower

Bailout talks stall as Bush meets with Congressional leaders and Presidential candidates. German Finance Minister says US will no longer be the financial Superpower. French President Sarkozy says the days when "the all powerful market is always right are over". The Real News Network spoke to economist and historian Dr. Michael Hudson who says that it's not a "bailout" but a "giveaway" and will create a new kleptocracy of billionaires.

Watch Video:

Advertising

Submit Your Protest Letters to Biddho.com

Focus - Canada Rectify your Mistake!!

Sponsored Links

Advertising!


Shaebia 2008 - No Force Can Trample the Choice of the People

Shaebia 2008 - No Force Can Trample the Choice of the People!!
Shaebia 2008 - No Force Can Trample the Choice of the People!!

Freedom!

Freedom!

War - No thank you!!
Support Warsay Yekaalo

Canada Rectify your Mistake!

Focus - Canada Rectify your Mistake!!

Biddho.com TV - Eritrea’s Export Oriented Banana and Tomato Processing Factory

Glory to the Eritrean army of development!!
Powered by Asmarino5 (www.eastafro.com)

Biddho.com TV - Sawa 21st Round Military Graduation Ceremony

Glory to the Eritrean army of development!!
Powered by Asmarino5 (www.eastafro.com)

EXPIRED - WOYANE and UNMEE!!

The Algiers Agreement is explicit that the parties are bound to honor the Commission’s decisions

Image
Letter dated Nov. 30'07 from the Legal Adviser to the President of Eritrea to the president of the UNSC


Ethiopia rejects "virtual" border with Eritrea

Image


Ethiopia - Meles Zenawi calls final and binding demarcation decision `legal fiction´!

Image

From `legal nonsense´ to `legal fiction´.


Who is the Blackmailer?

Image


Ban-Ki Moon: Messenger versus the Message

Image


ERITREA - ETHIOPIA: Security Council’s Moment of Truth

Image


Seven Years After Algiers

Image


DEMARCATION IS COMPLETE - TSZ EXPIRES

ImageWith effect from midnight tonight (30.11.2007), the demarcation of Ethio-Eritrean boundary will be as complete as any demarcated interstate boundary would be, if not better defined.


STATEMENT ON UNMEE’S “RELOCATION” FROM ERITREA

Image

Permanent Mission of Eritrea to the United Nations


Eritrea - Statement on UNMEE's "Relocation"

Image


Eritrea - Ministry of Foreign Affairs


UNMEE - United Nations Misson for the Exploitation of Eritrea

Image


Ambassador John Bolton Blows UNMEE’s Transparent Cover

Image


UNMEE-Another Failed UN Peacekeeping Mission

Image


 

EEBC ruling of 2002 indisputable!!

Algiers Agreement of Eritrea and Ethiopia is implemented!! EEBC ruling of 2002 indisputable!! All the chapters in the process have now reached a legal conclusion! President Isaias Afwerki. VIVA ERITREA!

>> eGermenaLo translated: WE ARE SURPRICED!


>> FINAL AND BINDING - Eritrean Ethiopian Boundary Commissions MANDATE is FULFILLED
>> Seven Years After Algiers

Google Ads