| Condoleezza Rice Misleading Congress - Secretary´s Misdirection exposed |
|
|
| Written by Sam B. | |
| Tuesday, 30 October 2007 | |
In a testimony to the House Judiciary Committee on Middle East Policy US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice provided a disingenuous and misleading testimony in her reply to a question from Congressman Payne regarding the Eritrea Ethiopia conflict.
Congressman Payne asked; “the Ethiopia-Eritrean situation, and bottoming the demarcation of the borders had not been accepted by Ethiopia, our big ally in Africa … And I wonder if our administration is urging Ethiopia to accept the agreement that they said they would accept from The Hague as relates to the border dispute between Eritrea and Ethiopia.” “It has been difficult to talk to Eritrea, frankly. We've had trouble getting them to talk to us. And I sent our assistant secretary to talk with Mr. Isaias, and he didn't see her.” “So while we are saying to the Ethiopians that certain things need to be done, it would be very helpful if the Eritreans would show a little bit more interest in what the United States has to say.” Biddho.com Tip: Read the findings of EEBC known as 25th report to UN to Expose Rice´ camouflage: Of course their “big ally in Africa”, Ethiopia, has refused to accept and implement the “final and binding” ruling from The Hague. The agreement that lead to The Hague ruling was an agreement the United States authored to major part and signed as a witness and guarantor. Their “big ally in Africa” would have acquiesced if the United States had pressured it to honor its treaty obligation. After all, as Ignacio Ramonet in Le Monde Diplomatique article, ‘Servile States’ writes: “An empire does not have allies-it has only vassals. This is a fact of history that most governments … seem to have forgotten. As they come under pressure from Washington … we see nominally sovereign countries allowing themselves to be reduced to the demeaning status of satellites.” That said Condoleezza Rice’s statement that she sent her “assistant secretary to talk with Mr. Isaias, and he didn't see her” is either a lie, or, she does not know what she speaks of. Either way is unbecoming of a person of her position. Rice’s assistant secretary, Jendayi Frazer, statements contradicts hers. When a reporter asked Jendayi Frazer if the Government of Eritrea refused her visa to inter the country in 2005 or since, or if they have refused to see her, she answered: “No, I wasn't denied a visa then either. What the Eritrean Government said was that they did not want me to go to the border. My plan was to go to the border through Asmara and then to go to Ethiopia. The Eritreans gave me a visa and said, you're welcome to come to the country, but do not go to the border. I said, the only purpose of coming is to go to the border. And so I went through Ethiopia instead of Eritrea. So I have not sought a visa since that time.” Condoleezza Rice’s other false claim is that that the US “had trouble getting them [Eritrea] to talk to us”. Here again the record shows otherwise. For instance a New York Times October 5, 2007 report by Jeffrey Gettleman states: “American diplomats have been quietly working with the Eritreans to push Darfur’s ever expanding galaxy of rebel groups to peace talks scheduled for the end of October in Libya.” The fact that “American diplomats have been quietly working with the Eritrean” is not controversial at all. Even Condoleezza Rice’s assistant secretary, Jendayi Frazer, has said that she has communicated with Eritrea “through private channels” and “through diplomatic means -- talking to their ambassador here and our ambassador talking to the government officials in Eritrea”. Condoleezza Rice’s statement; “It has been difficult to talk to Eritrea”, makes little sense when one considers that not only have “American diplomats have been quietly working” and communicating with Eritrea “through private channels” and “through diplomatic means”, but also US Congressmen such as Donald Payne and US Secretary of Defense, Donald Rumsfeld, have both visited Eritrea and held talks not only with the President of Eritrea but also Eritrean Defense Minister, General Sebhat Ephrem, and others. It is even more bizarre when one considers not only the diplomatic access the United States enjoyed in Eritrea but also the unfettered access the US Defense Department has enjoyed in Eritrea, from US Secretary of Defense, Donald Rumsfeld, to the multiple visits of General Tommy Franks, commander in chief of the U.S. Central Command (USCENTCOM). Even Visiting US Navy commanders have been able to freely meet all levels of Eritrean military command. Ensign Lauren A. Kent, a US Navy Ship, USS Hopper, Public Affairs writes:“The Hopper crew hosted a luncheon Oct. 8 and provided a ship tour for Eritrean Minister of Defense Gen. Sebhat Ephrem, U.S. Ambassador to Eritrea Scott Delisi, and Commander, Joint Task Force, Horn of Africa Marine Maj. Gen. Samuel T. Helland, as well as other Eritrean military officials and U.S. embassy personnel.”
>>> !!As such Eritrea has no need for masters but mutual partners!! <<<
|
|
| Last Updated ( Saturday, 03 November 2007 ) |
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|
>> Download MP3 Song - "Egermenalo" by Wedi Tikabo


Letter dated Nov. 30'07 from the Legal Adviser to the President of Eritrea to the president of the UNSC
From `legal nonsense� to `legal fiction�.

With effect from midnight tonight (30.11.2007), the demarcation of Ethio-Eritrean boundary will be as complete as any demarcated interstate boundary would be, if not better defined.